Month: January 2014

Rejoicing in Suffering

hardship

Are you ready? Hebrews 10:32-34

Recall the former days when, after you were enlightened, you endured a hard struggle with sufferings, sometimes being publicly exposed to abuse and affliction and sometimes being partners with those so treated.

Now let me stop there and give you the situation as I read it. In the early days of the church persecution arose. Some of them suffered outright and publicly, and others had compassion on them. You’ll see in the next verse that some of them were imprisoned and some of them went to visit them. So they were forced into a decision. Those who were in prison in those days probably depended on others for food and water and any kind of physical care that they would need, but that meant that their friends and neighbors had to go public and identify with them. That’s risky business when someone’s been put in jail because they’re a Christian. So those who were still free went underground for a few hours and asked, “What are we going to do?” And somebody said “Psalm 63:3 says, ‘The steadfast love of the Lord is better than life.’ It’s better then life. Let’s go!”

And if Martin Luther would have been there he would have said,

Let goods and kindred go,
this mortal life also.
The body they may kill,
God’s truth abideth still.
His kingdom is forever.
Let’s go!”

And that’s exactly what they did. Let’s read the rest of it. Verse 34, “You had compassion on the prisoners and you joyfully accepted the plundering of your property.”

Now here’s what happened. It doesn’t take any imagination. I don’t know all the details precisely, but here’s what happened: They had compassion on the prisoners, which means they went to them. And their property—house, chariot, horses, mules, carpentry stools, chairs, whatever—was set on fire by mob or maybe just ransacked and thrown to the streets by people with big knives. And when they looked over their shoulder to see what was happening back there they rejoiced.

Now if you’re not like this—when somebody bashes your computer when you’re trying to minister to them, or you drive downtown to minister and they smash your windshield, get your radio, or slash your tires—if you’re not like this, you’re not going to be a very good candidate for martyrdom either. So the question is, “How are you going to be like this?” I want to be like this. That’s why I love this text! I want to be like this.

I make no claim to be a perfect embodiment of this; but I want to be like this, so that when a rock comes sailing through my kitchen window—like it has done twice in the last couple of months—and smashes the glass and my wife and children hit the floor not knowing if it’s a bullet or a grenade, I want to be able to say, “Isn’t this a great neighborhood to live in.” This is where the needs are. You see those 5 teenage kids that just rode by? They need Jesus. If I move out of here, who’s going to tell them about Jesus?

When your little boy gets pushed off his bicycle and they take it and run, I want to be able to take him by the neck while he’s crying and say “Barnabas, this is like being a missionary. It’s like getting ready for the mission field! This is great!”

{Excepts taken from a portion of a sermon preached by John Piper titled “Doing Missions”

http://www.desiringgod.org/conference-messages/doing-missions-when-dying-is-gain

Contending for the Faith

contending

Today it is fashionable to identify with a church. When choosing a church, you don’t ask – “Or is it friendly?” The biblical approach is to ask, “Does it contend for the faith once delivered to the saints?”

Jude, the half- brother of Jesus in his epistle address four things that any one thinking of being a Christian, pastor or preacher in this age must reconsider.

1. There is a faith once for all delivered to the saints.
2. This faith is worth contending for.
3. This faith is repeatedly threatened from within the church.
4. Every genuine believer should contend for the faith.

When Arius in the first century argued that the Son was to be understood as being of a similar substance as the Father, Athanasius correctly understood that the entirety of the Gospel was at risk. As Athanasius faithfully led the church to understand, the New Testament clearly teaches that the Son is of the same substance as the Father. In the Greek language, the distinction between the word offered by Arius and the correction offered by Athanasius was a single syllable. Looking back, we can now see that when the Council of Nicaea met in A.D. 325, the Gospel was defended and defined at this very point. Without the role of Athanasius as both pastor and theologian, the heresy of Arius might have spread unchecked, leading to disaster for the young church.

Small Things – Big Things

 James, the brother of Jesus said in chapter 3, “A SMALL BIT in the mouth of a horse controls the whole horse. A SMALL RUDDER on a huge ship in the hands of a skilled captain sets a course in the face of the strongest winds……” 

mustard seed

 

SMALL THINGS that no one sees or cares about results in BIG THINGS everyone wants. Small things done with great faith, hope and love of Christ the hope of our glory, results in BIG THINGS that no eye has seen and no ear has heard. What small things will you choose to commit your time, strength and might this year?

The Planting of the LORD

If GOD plants a tree, He will cause it to flourish.There is no chance or good-luck with God! What He plants is sure to take root. Satan may seek to tear it up. The foxes may try to spoil the vines. There may be chilling winds. There may be long droughts. The sun may seek to smite it by day and the moon by night, but God has promised that it shall flourish and flourish it must! See to it that your endeavors are rightly planted in God. Be very hopeful. God, who has been pleased to give you Divine Grace, will bestow on you more Grace and then more Grace—Grace upon Grace—Grace for every crisis and every emergency!

MLKbirthplace

EBENEZER

The pulpit and the Ebenezer Baptist Church, pastured by Martin Luther King, Sr. and Alberta Williams King and where Martin Luther King Jr gave his trial sermon at the age of 19 has not only made a difference in this land, but has left a permanent mark. If the Kingdom of Heavens were to reveal the statistics of souls who have stepped in that ‘holy ground,’ in Atlanta GA, and have had ‘their hearts strangely warmed’, many would be greatly astonished. The eyes of the LORD are wondering to and fro looking for such kinds of pulpit and churches daring to stand for holiness and righteousness.

EBENEZER

The marriage of Martin Luther King Jr. and Coretta Scott King testify to the fact death doesn’t necessarily do them that are united even when in death they are apart. Coretta remained Martin Luther King’s wife to the end, long after MLK was gone. In the end, they are buried side by side – a testimony rare to find in this generation. The union of the two souls testifies to a rare kind of love and a marriage built to last. Can God find such marriages today that can not only withstand the criticisms and pressures of the outsiders but stand for justice? Can God find a man or a woman today who long after the partner is gone remains the true soul mate? Or you think that is a punishment.

ebenezermlk

 

Pulpit

The pulpit must give tone to public sentiment because the house of GOD is the forerunner, ally and supporter of the best forms of civilization. Let the bible through the pulpit purify public sentiment and the influence of the pulpit be felt and vice would be put to shame and confusion.

 

EBC-Dr

Tribute to Martin L & Coretta Scott King Jr.

coretta-martin-luther-king-wives-gallery-260-316x373-1

After lengthy theological training in the North, King returned to his home region, becoming pastor of  Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama.

As a promising newcomer free from the morass of inter-church politics, King became the leader of the Montgomery Bus Boycott when it broke out in 1955. That year-long non-violent protest, which led to a Supreme Court ruling against bus segregation, brought King to the attention of the country as a whole, and led to the formation of the Southern Christian Leadership Co an alliance of black Southern churches and ministers. This group elected King their president, and began looking for other civil rights battles to fight.

The episodes immediately following met with less success, but nonetheless provided King with the opportunity to refine his protest strategies. Then, in 1963, King and the SCLC joined a campaign in Birmingham, Alabama, to end segregation there and to force downtown businesses to employ blacks. Peaceful protests were met by fire-hoses and attack-dogs wielded by local police. Images of this violence, broadcast on national news, provoked outrage, and this reaction created a political atmosphere in which strong federal civil rights legislation could gain favor and passage, and the next year President Lyndon Johnson signed into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Meanwhile the SCLC, under King, was repeating the tactics of Birmingham in Selma, Alabama, this time for the sake of African American voterregistration. Once again, images of the police brutality directed at the protest enabled the passage of federal legislation, this time the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The community of black activists felt that these two major victories marked the limit of what gains could be made politically, and thus after 1965 King began to focus on blacks’ economic problems. His strategies and speeches concentrated increasingly on class as well as race, and addressed the United States as a whole. King had won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, and this recognition

encouraged him to broaden his scope: by the time of his death, he was speaking out virulently against the Vietnam War, and was organizing a Poor People’s March on Washington.

When King was assassinated in 1968, the nation shook with the impact. Riots broke out in over one hundred American cities. King was almost immediately sanctified by the white-controlled media, which, however, in its coverage of his accomplishments, also neglected the radicalism of his final three years. Instead his contemporaries focused (as we continue to focus today) on the spirit and the accomplishments of the middle of King’s career. For many born after his death, he is known best for the “I Have a Dream” speech, which reflects this spirit, and which he delivered in 1963 at the height of his fame. The federal holiday commemorates this King, who articulated the progressive, human hope of the early 1960s.

GOD HONORS GENUINE REPENTANCE

 

 

Psalm 25.4-5

For nine years, we were in Dallas leading the song of victory which began October 2004 at the bosom of the General Conference with the motto, “Sharing the Gospel to All People!” The General Conference that meets once every four years is scheduled to meet from May 12 – 15. At the end of this year’s session there will either be a shout of victory from the delegates or a shout of victory in heaven as those gathered inside and outside, invited and uninvited,  the welcomed and the expelled will become saturated with a great moaning and crying over sins of omissions and commission. Only with such brokenness will the amazing and astonishing  power of God is seen and the work of home mission granted a bright future- winning souls for Jesus.

The way you prove you love God, your neighbor and the multiethnic generation that is coming after you is to be honest about sin — including your own sin. The knowledge of our sin drives us to seek refuge in Christ, in whom we find forgiveness and everlasting life — in order to tell the good news of the forgiveness of sin and salvation in Christ.

It is possible that this is the General Conferencing where we will see who the evangelicals really are –  those who believe in the gospel itself, in all of its truth and all of its grace.  Decisions ahead will not be easy and it is prudent to remember that there is no resistance if the gospel you’re preaching doesn’t threaten the silversmiths of the Temple of Artemis.

Keep the General Conference in prayers as it convenes on May to seek the will of God on many matters. There will be election of a presiding elder on May 13, 2014 and taking office August 1, 2014. Ask the Kingdom of Heavens in all manner of supplication and intercession to raise someone full of the Holy Spirit and with unwavering passion to keep the church close to a reliable Bible for the sake of evangelistic and missionary outreach to all people.

Pray that in other sessions the Kingdom of heavens will shout in victory as delegates lead the church to repudiate segregationist views and the racist legacy, for the declaration of the good news that God saves sinners in multiracial venues as a witness to the coming kingdom. If what the Bible clearly teaches and what the church has held for 2000 years is true that heaven is a place for people from all races, tongues and kindred, then refusing to call for repentance is unspeakably cruel and, in fact, devilish. The devil works in two ways: by deception, “You shall not surely die” (Gen. 3:4); and by accusation, “the accuser of the brethren” (Rev 12:10). For some people, the devil wishes to assure that there’s no need for repentance, for others that there’s no hope for mercy. Some people are deceived into thinking they are too good for the gospel while others are accused into thinking they’re too bad for the gospel.

The gospel of Jesus Christ tears down both strategies. The gospel clearly calls us to repentance, even when that repentance is hated by the outside world. And the gospel clearly calls us to mercy by faith in the blood of Christ, even when we can’t believe that we’d ever be received. We empower darkness when we refuse to warn of judgment. We empower the darkness when we refuse to offer forgiveness through the blood of the cross. To all repentant souls in the General Conference, who throw themselves upon Christ after years of justifying slavery, lynching and saying, “You kids get off my lawn,” thus saith the LORD, “there is no condemnation for those who belong to Christ Jesus.” The Kingdom of Heavens is not pleased with the self-righteous preaching and the act of finding another guilty. There is no rejoicing in heaven over the self-righteous actions of a group of people gathered to condemn sin and to do so in the most hateful and angry ways possible.  The gospel is the declaration of the good news that God saves sinners. It is the declaration of the fact that there is forgiveness of sins and life everlasting to be found in Christ and in belief in Him.

The kingdom of heaven shouts in victory when we are on our knees before a Holy God. The kingdom of heavens shouts in victory when God looks down and says, “I think they’ve gotten it right.” The way we will see success in the work of Home Mission in the United States of America days ahead is by taking delight in sharing the Gospel and God’s bountiful blessings with “those who are not like us,” not as an act of charity, but because they too are joint-heirs of the kingdom and future co-rulers of the universe.

God is a God of turnarounds. GOD causes events to turnaround for good like he did for Joseph, Daniel and many great heroes of faith. What a great God He is. He is a God of fruitfulness; He is a God of overwhelming mercy and turnaround. Bless His name. Glory be to God. May our GOOD GOD keep you in HIS good care and meet with all your needs according to HIS riches in glory. May he bring the good out of the bad experiences and MAY YOU SHOUT IN JOY WHEN THE KINGDOM OF HEAVENS SHOUTS IN VICTORY….

REMEMBER WHAT GOD HAS DONE

Joshua 4:21-24 – “In the future,” he said, “when your children ask you why these stones are here and what they mean, 22 you are to tell them that these stones are a reminder of this amazing miracle—that the nation of Israel crossed the Jordan River on dry ground! 23 Tell them how the Lord our God dried up the river right before our eyes and then kept it dry until we were all across! It is the same thing the Lord did forty years ago[b] at the Red Sea! 24 He did this so that all the nations of the earth will realize that Jehovah is the mighty God, and so that all of you will worship him forever.”

Thank you partners for standing with Victory Fellowship, the flagship Home Missions work of the General Conference. Victory Fellowship has been based in Dallas, Texas the last  9 years with many christian conferencing about Home Missions occuring in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina and Maryland.

There are many of you that we’ve lived together through some unbelievably happy and some unbelievably miserable ministry experiences. Everywhere in which you broke down in tears – mark the locations. In those very same places and situations, God is in action and will bring good things out of those places.

Father’s Day

father'sday

9 Famous Fathers in the Bible Who Set Worthy Examples

Adam – The First Man

AdamAndEve2504x2021.jpg

Getty Images

As the first man and first human father, Adam had no example to follow except God. He faltered on that, plunging the world into sin. He also had to deal with the tragedy of his son Cain murdering his other son, Abel. Adam has much to teach today’s fathers about the consequences of our actions and the absolute necessity of obeying God.

Noah – A Righteous Man

NoahAndArk541x650.jpg

Noah stands out among fathers in the Bible as a man who clung to God in spite of the wickedness all around him. What could be more relevant today? Noah was far from perfect, but he was humble and protective of his family. He bravely carried out the task God assigned to him. Modern fathers may often feel they are in a thankless role, but God is always pleased by their devotion.

Abraham – Father of the Jewish Nation

AbrahamHagar1500x1278.jpg

What could be more frightening than being the father of an entire nation? That was the mission God gave Abraham. He was a leader with tremendous faith, passing one of the most difficult tests God ever gave a man. Abraham made mistakes when he relied on himself instead of God. Still, he embodied qualities that any father would be wise to develop.

Isaac – Son of Abraham

Isaac1500x1397.jpg

Many fathers feel intimidated trying to follow in the footsteps of their own father. Isaac must have felt that way. His father Abraham was such an outstanding leader that Isaac could have gone wrong. He could have resented his father for offering him as a sacrifice, yet Isaac was an obedient son. From Abraham he learned the invaluable lesson of trusting God. That made Isaac one of the most favored fathers in the Bible.

Jacob – Father of the 12 Tribes of Israel

Jacob and Rachel

Jacob was a schemer who tried to work his own way instead of trusting God. With the help of his mother Rebekah, he stole his twin brother Esau’s birthright. Jacob fathered 12 sons who founded the 12 tribes of Israel. As a father, however, he favored his son Joseph, causing jealousy among the other brothers. The lesson from Jacob’s life is that God works with our obedience and in spite of our disobedience to make his plan come to pass.

Moses – Giver of the Law

MosesAndLaw1539x1747.jpg

Moses was the father of two sons, Gershom and Eliezer, yet he also served as a father figure to the entire Hebrew people as they escaped from slavery in Egypt. He loved them and helped discipline and provide for them on their 40-year journey to the Promised Land. At times Moses seemed to be a larger-than-life character, but he was only a man. He shows today’s fathers that overwhelming tasks can be achieved when we stay close to God.

King David – A Man After God’s Own Heart

Young David in Goliath's Armor

One of the great strugglers in the Bible, David was also a special favorite of God. He trusted God to help him defeat the giant Goliath and put his faith in God as he was on the run from King Saul. David sinned greatly, but he repented and found forgiveness. His son Solomon went on to become one of Israel’s greatest kings.

Joseph – Earthly Father of Jesus

JosephCarpenter2077x1688.jpg

Surely one of the most underrated fathers in the Bible was Joseph, the foster father of Jesus Christ. He went to great pains to protect his wife Mary and their baby, then saw to Jesus’ education and needs as he was growing up. Joseph taught Jesus the carpentry trade. The Bible calls Joseph a righteous man, and Jesus must have loved his guardian for his quiet strength, honesty, and kindness.

God the Father

Father-God.jpg

God the father, first Person of the Trinity, is the father and creator of all. Jesus, his only Son, showed us a new, intimate way of relating to him. When we see God as our heavenly Father, provider and protector, it puts our life in a whole new perspective. Every human father is also a son of this Most High God, the constant source of strength, wisdom, and hope.

 

Some less convenient facts of History gleaned from Wikipedia

Father’s Day was inaugurated in the United States in the early 20th century to complement Mother’s Day in celebrating fatherhood and maleparenting.

After the success obtained by Anna Jarvis with the promotion of Mother’s Day in the US, some individuals, such as Sonora Dodd,wanted to create similar holidays for other family members, and Father’s Day was the choice most likely to succeed. There were other persons in the US who independently thought of “Father’s Day”, but the credit for the modern holiday is often given to Sonora Dodd of Central Methodist Episcopal Church, who was the driving force behind its establishment.

Father’s Day was founded in Spokane, Washington at the YMCA in 1910 by Sonora Smart Dodd, who was born in Arkansas. Its first celebration was in the Spokane YMCA on June 19, 1910.] Her father, the Civil War veteran William Jackson Smart, was a single parent who raised his six children there. After hearing a sermon about Jarvis’ Mother’s Day in 1909 at Central Methodist Episcopal Church, she told herpastor that fathers should have a similar holiday honoring them. Although she initially suggested June 5, her father’s birthday, the pastors did not have enough time to prepare their sermons, and the celebration was deferred to the third Sunday of June. Several local clergymen accepted the idea, and on 19 June 1910, the first Father’s Day, “sermons honoring fathers were presented throughout the city.”

However, in the 1920s, Dodd stopped promoting the celebration because she was studying in the Art Institute of Chicago, and it faded into relative obscurity, even in Spokane. In the 1930s, Dodd returned to Spokane and started promoting the celebration again, raising awareness at a national level. She had the help of those trade groups that would benefit most from the holiday, for example the manufacturers of ties, tobacco pipes, and any traditional present to fathers. By 1938 she had the help of the Father’s Day Council, founded by the New York Associated Men’s Wear Retailers to consolidate and systematize the commercial promotion. Americans resisted the holiday for its first few decades, viewing it as nothing more than an attempt by merchants to replicate the commercial success of Mother’s Day, and newspapers frequently featured cynical and sarcastic attacks and jokes. However, said merchants remained resilient and even incorporated these attacks into their advertisements.  By the mid-1980s, the Father’s Council wrote that “(…) [Father’s Day] has become a Second Christmas for all the men’s gift-oriented industries.”

A bill to accord national recognition of the holiday was introduced in Congress in 1913. In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson went to Spokane to speak in a Father’s Day celebration and wanted to make it official, but Congress resisted, fearing that it would become commercialized.

US President Calvin Coolidge recommended in 1924 that the day be observed by the nation, but stopped short of issuing a national proclamation.[15] Two earlier attempts to formally recognize the holiday had been defeated by Congress. In 1957, Maine Senator Margaret Chase Smith wrote a proposal accusing Congress of ignoring fathers for 40 years while honoring mothers, thus “[singling] out just one of our two parents”. In 1966, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued the first presidential proclamation honoring fathers, designating the third Sunday in June as Father’s Day. Six years later, the day was made a permanent national holiday when President Richard Nixon signed it into law in 1972.

Scripture is filled with people we can learn much from. When it comes to the challenging vocation of fatherhood, several fathers in the Bible show what is wise to do–and what is not wise to do.

At the end of this list, you’ll find a profile of God the Father, the ultimate role model for all human dads. His love, kindness, patience, wisdom, and protectiveness are impossible standards to live up to. Fortunately he is also forgiving and understanding, answering fathers’ prayers and giving them expert guidance so they can be the man their family wants them to be.

Trial of J. Gresham Machen

The Strange Church Trial of a Spiritual Giant.

It all happened around seventy-seven years ago.  Back in March of 1935, Dr. J. Gresham Machen was before a church court of his peers seeking to defend himself against the serious charges of denying his ordination vows, disapproval of the government and discipline of the church, advocating a rebellious defiance against the lawful authority of the church, and we could go on and on in the charges leveled against this spiritual giant.  You would think that he was guilty of the most aggravated doctrinal error or moral shortcomings.  But in reality, it came down to a single issue—that of refusing to obey the 1934 mandate of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. to cease and desist from supporting an independent board of missionaries, of which board he was the president.

The trial itself was a farce in every sense of the word.  Machen’s defense first tried to challenge certain members of the judicial commission itself as biased, seeking to have them recuse themselves, since at least two of these men had signed the theologically liberal Auburn affirmation.  That was denied.  Then the question of jurisdiction was argued, but that also was not sustained.

At the third session, upon hearing Dr. Machen declare himself “not guilty,” the Commission ruled that certain matters were out-of-bounds in the arguments of the defense case.  Those included questions which surrounded the existence of the Auburn Affirmation, signed in 1924.  They next ruled out any question concerning the nature and conduct of the official Board of Foreign Missions, which had prompted much of the problem when it gave its endorsement to the book entitled Rethinking Missions.  Further, arguments stemming from the reorganization of Princeton Seminary and the founding of Westminster Theological Seminary were also outlawed by the commission.  All of these were part and parcel of Dr. Machen’s defense, since they provided the background of the origin of the Independent Board of Presbyterian Foreign Missions.

All these rulings paled into insignificance, so to speak, however, when we consider the last ruling of the judicial commission.  It stated that the legality of the Thirty-Fourth General Assembly’s Mandate for the ministers, members, and churches to cease supporting the Independent Board and only support the official Board of Foreign Missions could not be questioned.

It was obvious that with all of these rulings, that there was only one verdict which could come forth from this judicial commission, and that was guilty.  And so on this date, March 29, 1935, the judgment of “Guilty” was rendered by this seven member Judicial Commission of the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.   Appeals to the higher courts were in vain, and J. Gresham Machen was suspended by the church.

Words to Live By:  In whatever issue which confronts us inside or outside the church, we must remember that God is Lord alone of our conscience, with the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments the  only infallible guide of faith and life.   Let us hold to those, not fearing what man can do to us.

 

A Stirring Confession of Faith

machen02On Sunday evening, March 17, 1935, Dr. J. Gresham Machen filled the pulpit of the  First Presbyterian Church of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This time period was in the framework of being under indictment for refusing to cease and desist from the support of the Independent Board for Presbyterian Foreign Mission, as the Mandate from the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church USA, had stated in 1934. His ordination was thus at stake. His standing in that denomination was at stake. Listen to his profession of faith given on that evening.

“My profession of faith is simply that I know nothing of the Christ proclaimed, through the Auburn Affirmation. I know nothing of a Christ who is presented to us in a human book containing errors, but know only a Christ presented in a divine book, the Bible which is true from beginning to end.  I know nothing of a Christ who possibly was and possibly was not born of a virgin, but know only a Christ who was truly conceived by the Holy Ghost and born of the Virgin Mary. I know nothing of a Christ who possibly did and possibly did not work miracles, but know only a Christ who said to the winds and the waves, with the sovereign voice of the Maker and Ruler of all nature, ‘Peace be still.’  I know nothing of a Christ who possible  did and possibly did not come out of the tomb on the first Easter morning, but know only a Christ who triumphed over sin and the grave and is living now in His glorified body until He shall come again and I shall see Him with my very eyes. I know nothing of a Christ who possibly did and possibly did not die as my substitute on the cross, but know only a Christ who took upon Himself the just punishment of my sins and died there in my stead to make it right with the holy God.”

Despite what the ecclesiastical machinery of the Presbyterian Church would do, Dr. Machen’s conviction was settled.  He ended it all by stating that he would “rather be condemned for an honest adherence to the Bible and to my solemn ordination pledge than enjoy the highest ecclesiastical honors and emoluments as the reward of dishonesty.”

Words to Live By: Can you echo the words of J. Gresham Machen today? Today the attacks continue upon both the written and living Word. Let us affirm this confession today—for the Word of God is true, though all men stand in error—until God takes us home.

PASTOR SCORES MODERNISM AS CAUSE OF TRIAL.

Dr. J. Gresham Machen Defends Beliefs in Sermon At Church Here.

HEARING TOMORROW.

Philadelphia Minister Will Face Presbyterian Court AT Trention.

Dr. J. Gresham Machen of Philadelphia, president of the Independent Board of [sic] Presbyterian Foreign Missions, who goes on trial before a special court of the church tomorrow at Trenton, N.J., declared last night: “The Presbyterian Church is in the midst of a conflict between two irreconcilable adversaries–Christianity and Modernism.”

Speaking at the First Presbyterian Church here, Dr. Machen defended his fundamentalist beliefs and accused the Presbyterian Church of spreading “anti-Christian” propaganda.

“I cannot support this anti-Christian propaganda now being furthered by the official board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States,” he said. “I cannot place the shifting votes of general assemblies or any other human councils in place of an authority which rightly belongs only to the Word of God.

Refused to Quit Board

The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church last year outlawed the Independent Board of Missions and ordered all ministers to resign from it within 90 days. Dr. Machen refused and was ordered to stand trial before the New Brunswick presbytery. Two hearings have been held and the third and final one is scheduled tomorrow.

Dr. Machen last night laid his troubles to “modernists” and asserted: “Christianity is taught in the Bible and the Constitution of the Church; but modernism has grown to dominate the ecclesiastical machine.”

Attacks Auburn Affirmation

Citing the Auburn Affirmation, which he said sets forth the modernist argument and is signed by 1923 ministers, Dr. Machen declared:

“The Auburn Affirmation directly attacks the doctrines of the full truthfulness of the Bible and declares that some of its basic teachings are merely theories among other possible theories and are non-essential.

“It is typical of the conditions in the church that Dr. Cordie J. Culp of New Brunswick, the presiding officer of the commission now trying me in Trenton, is a signer of the modernist document,” he said. “It is also typical that John E. Kuizenga of Princeton Seminary took the lead in the unanimous vote of the commission that all efforts of my counsel to refer to the modernist doument be barred.”

Professor at Seminary

Dr. Machen further declared he is prepared to prove that the board’s orders for him to resign are “contrary to the constitution of the church.”

“I have also offered to prove,” he said, “the Board of Foreign Missions is unfaithful to its great trust. The commission has refused to listen to my evidence or to the arguments of my counsel. Of course, I will be condemned, but I should far rather be condemned for an honest adherence to the Bible and to my solemn ordination pledge than enjoy even the highest ecclesiastical honors and emoulments [sic] as the rewards of dishonesty.”

Dr. Machen, who spoke in the absence of Dr. C. E. Macartney, is a profess of New Testament in Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia.

[excerpted from The Pittsburgh Press, 18 March 1935, page 11.]

[Note: The correction name of the organization is the Independent Board for Presbyterian Foreign Missions. Too often in news coverage and elsewhere, the name was shown in error, substituting “of” in place of “for”]

The Security of an Honest Life

About three years ago we transitioned from local church involvement to serve the wider Body of Christ. We have no church–based salary but enjoy the adventure of ministry partnership with faithful friends undergirding us in this new season of life. That is our current station in life.  In Christ, we secure and enjoying the abundant life Jesus promised.

In adulthood when stakes are high and issues of ethics and integrity impact other people’s lives, we must steer clear of all duplicity and deceitfulness. God takes this very seriously as documented by a medical doctor in the Book of Acts.

God wants to bless His children for honest work and generosity

The first mention of sin and the term “church” in Acts is in the fifth chapter. The latter is cited in verse 11, “Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.”

As Christianity was being launched, there was such a high level of purity and power on display that “many miraculous signs and wonders” (v.12) occurred; “no one else dared join them, even though they were highly regarded by the people” (v.13); “more and more men and women believed in the Lord…” (v.14); and, “Crowds gathered also from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those tormented by evil spirits, and all of them were healed” (v.16).

This description of the early Christian church took place immediately after a couple by the name of Ananias and Sapphira experienced divine discipline. His name means “the Lord is gracious” and hers “beautiful”, but the narrative unfolds a chilling yet factual account of their judgment for trying to manufacture an image not rooted in truth.

As part of the covenant community that agreed to voluntarily share possessions in common and help the less fortunate in their midst (Acts 4:34-37), this power couple sold some real estate, projected an image of giving everything, yet cleverly concealed the truth as they held back some for themselves.

Ananias and Sapphira had every right to keep back whatever amount they chose, but to dishonestly give the inflated impression that they were giving all when they had not was the sin of deceit. They both paid dearly for their deliberate deception as the account reveals.

Here’s the deal: Because of a lack of a healthy fear of God in our society plus our casual approach to sin, the narrative seems severe. Yet the closer we get to the return of Jesus at the end of the age, shouldn’t we expect to see similar activity of a holy God simultaneous to an increase in signs, wonders and the miraculous?

We want the latter but are we ready to accept the former as God awakens and restores His true Church? Are we candidates for God’s pruning so we can drop the masks, stop man-pleasing, renounce the fear of man and simply rest in being who God uniquely designed us to be?

REFERENCE: Adapted from a Christian Post article by Larry Tomczak, a best-selling author and cultural commentator with over 40 years of trusted ministry experience.

John Calvin Vs. Jacob Arminius

TULIP

 

John Piper’s Take on New Calvinism – for the radiance of the glory of God in the gladness of a ransomed church from every tribe and tongue and people and nation (Revelation 5:9).

1. Total Depravity

The most crucial meaning of “total” in that phrase is that we are totally unable to save ourselves from dead, and unresponsive spiritual condition in rebellion against God. “The mind of the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God’s law; indeed, it cannot” (Romans 8:7). And we are in this together — every race, every ethnicity — united in helpless depravity.

The ethnic diversity of hell is a crucial doctrine. Romans 2:9 puts it like this: “There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek.” God is no respecter of persons in salvation or in damnation. The human race — and every ethnic group in it — are united in this great reality: we are all depraved and condemned. We are all lost in the woods together, sinking on the same boat, dying of the same disease.

If we saw this more clearly, two things would happen. We would be humbled and frightened and made desperate, like a little child, to find a Savior. I have never seen a white-hooded Klansman or a Farrakhan follower who was brokenhearted for his sin, humble, and desperate for a Savior. The other thing that would happen, if we saw how united we are in our depravity, is that the sins of others would look like the outworkings of our own hearts, and we would be slow to condemn and quick to show mercy.

The doctrine of total depravity has a huge role to play in humbling all ethnic groups and giving us a desperate equality in condemnation.

2. Unconditional Election

After Paul’s sermon in Antioch of Pisidia, Luke says: “When the Gentiles heard this they were glad and glorified the word of God. And as many as were for ordained to eternal life believed” (Acts 13:48). People believe because they are ordained to eternal life, not vice versa. The election to salvation precedes the condition of salvation. “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion” (Romans 9:15).

This means that God does not choose his people on the basis of skin color or any other racial or ethnic distinctive. No ethnic group can say they are chosen because of God’s preference for their physical or psychological or spiritual or intellectual qualities. And no ethnic group can say that they are not chosen because of the have or don’t have, what they are or are not. God’s choice is unconditional. It is not based on anything in us. He is absolutely free and unconstrained. This is his glory, his name. And acting this way to uphold his name and his glory is his righteousness.

Therefore unconditional election severs the deepest root of all racism and all ethnocentrism. If I am among God’s elect, it is owing entirely to God’s free grace, not my distinctives. Therefore there is no ground in God’s election for pride. And there is no ground in God’s election for despair. Nothing in me caused him to choose me. And nothing in you could have stopped him from choosing you. When it comes to election, we are on the absolutely level ground of unconditional mercy: “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion” (Romans 9:15).

From these two examples, I say again: the emergence of ethnic diversity in the New Calvinism, and the seriousness with which this issue is pursued, is not a glitch in the outworkings of the Doctrines of Grace. It is rather the outworking of their inalienable biblical implication.

The Glory of God

Which leads finally to the great unifying, overarching, all-explaining focus of Reformed theology, the glory of God. Geerhardus Vos asked the question in 1891, What is it about Reformed theology that enables that tradition to grasp the fullness of Scripture unlike any other branch of Christendom? He answered, “Because Reformed theology took hold of the Scriptures in their deepest root idea. . . . This root idea which served as the key to unlock the rich treasuries of the Scriptures was the preeminence of God’s glory in the consideration of all that has been created” (Redemptive History and Biblical Interpretation, 241–242).

If anything marks the New Calvinism it is the prevalence of Big God Theology. It is the reversal, at least in part, of David Wells’ lament. “It is this God,” he says, “majestic and holy in his being, this God whose love knows no bounds because his holiness knows no limits, who has disappeared from the modern evangelical world” (No Place for Truth, 300). The New Calvinism is one expression of the reversal of this lament.

When the New Calvinism poses the question: Why did God in creation and providence ordain that there be such a dazzling diversity among the peoples of the world, it answers: because the glory of God in Christ will shine more brightly when Christ saves and assembles a unified worshipping people from so much diversity.

Psalm 96 — “Declare his glory among the nations, his marvelous works among all the peoples! For great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised.” There is a greatness of praise that accords with the greatness of God’s glory. And the greatness of this praise will not be reached until his glory is declared among all the peoples of the world, because it is precisely the vast diversity of the peoples, all recognizing the glory and all reflecting the glory, and all resounding in praise to the glory that makes the praise suitable for the greatness of the glory of God.

Or, to say it another way, when Paul says in Romans 15:11, “Praise the Lord all you nations, and let all the peoples extol him,” he is saying that there is something about God that is so universally praiseworthy, and so profoundly beautiful, and so comprehensively worthy, and so deeply satisfying, that God will find passionate admirers in every diverse people group in the world. The true greatness of his glory will be manifest in the breadth of the diversity of those who perceive and cherish his beauty.

Here is a king glorious like no other king. Other kings conquer peoples, and subdue them, and put them in subjection by force, lest hatred for the king break out in open rebellion. But God is a king, so glorious and so beautiful, that he will have a willing, eager, admiring, loving, happy people from the entire, vast ethnic diversity of the all peoples of the world. The greatness of his glory — the many-faceted brilliance of his splendor — will be reflected not in the monochrome of a few million local admirers, but the polychrome of ten thousand cultures who find him to be their all in all.

A Prayer for the Movement

So the remarkable diversity of the New Calvinism, racially, ethnically, culturally is not a theological anomaly. It is a beautiful — and to be sure, imperfect — outworking of the inalienable implications of the greatest and most central doctrines of the Reformed faith — justification, the five points, the glory of God — so that, in the end, for this movement — whether short-lived or long—the meaning of race and of all the ethnicities of world — the reason they exist — is the radiance of the glory of God in the gladness of a ransomed church from every tribe and tongue and people and nation (Revelation 5:9).

 

Issues

“Calvinism”

(from John Calvin 1509-1564)

Position

“Arminianism”

(from Jacob Arminius 1559 – 1609)

Response

Total Depravity

Man is unable to respond to God in faith since he is spiritually dead in trespasses and sin. God first regenerates the spiritually dead person He chooses to save, then places the gift of repentance and faith into those He so chooses. Man has no part in this except in receiving God’s work and gifts. God does not draw those not chosen. While man is totally depraved, this refers to sin having affected every part of his being, not that he is unable to respond in faith to the drawing of God’s Spirit. Through the love of God all men are bestowed with prevenient grace (*see definition at end of article), thereby, all men are drawn by God. The free will of man allows some to respond to God’s grace by saying yes, and others by saying no.

Unconditional Election

In eternity God has elected those whom He chooses for salvation. Man plays no part in election, but if elected, cannot resist. While some teach that those not elected are damned by default (passive reprobation), others teach that God specifically elects others for damnation (active reprobation). Election is conditional. The elect are those who respond to God in faith, the condition of salvation. Those who do not respond in faith are lost because of their unbelief. The fore- knowledge of God that allows Him to know who will respond in faith in no way affects the free will choice of the individual.

Limited Atonement

Christ’s death on the cross was for the elect only, as it would be unthinkable for His blood to be shed in vain. If Christ had died for all, then all would be saved. As all are not saved, atonement is limited. Atonement is unlimited. Christ died for everyone, shedding His blood for the sins of the whole world. He paid the price for everyone, but it takes union with Him to receive the payment onto one’s account. When we become one with Christ, our sin becomes His sin, and His righteousness becomes our righteousness! The reason all are not saved is that all do not accept the “free gift.”

Irresistible Grace

God as Sovereign cannot have man successfully oppose Him, as this would violate God’s Divine omnipotence (being all-powerful). When God elects a person and bestows His grace upon him/her, the person cannot successfully resist that grace. Therefore, God’s grace is irresistible and His sovereignty is unchallenged. The Grace of God can be resisted without doing harm to God’s sovereignty since God as Sovereign gave man a free will to choose. This is part of God’s plan, a choice He made to allow man to accept or reject His grace. God, as Sovereign, is still able to accomplish His divine purpose for all things, even with man having free will to accept or reject grace.

Perseverance of the Saints

Those saved will continue to be faithful to the end. As they are elected and secured by God, under no choice or condition of their own, their continuance in salvation is guaranteed. They cannot turn away or in any way lose or forfeit their salvation. If someone does appear to totally and finally turn away, it is proof they were never chosen nor ever saved. Since election is unconditional and grace is irresistible, perseverance is guaranteed. For the saints to persevere in faith is required but not guaranteed. Since faith is the condition of salvation, a loss of faith would cause one to forfeit salvation (apostasy). As apostasy is the “willful” turning away from known truth, one would never lose salvation accidentally, or by committing a sin. Just as a person is not saved by good works one is not lost through bad works (sin). To lose salvation one must willfully reject Christ. Once apostasy occurs, there is no further drawing of the Spirit and no hope for the apostate.

TULIPFOMR