Month: January 2024

The Bolshevik Party

The Bolsheviks (Russian: большевики, bolsheviki; from большинство, bolshinstvo, ‘majority’), led by Vladimir Lenin, were a far-left faction of the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) which split with the Mensheviks at the Second Party Congress in 1903.

The Bolshevik party seized power in Russia in the October Revolution of 1917, and was later renamed the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Their ideology and practices, based on Leninist and later Marxist–Leninist principles, are known as Bolshevism.

The origin of the split was Lenin’s support for a smaller party of professional revolutionaries, as opposed to the Menshevik desire for a broad party membership. The influence of the two factions fluctuated in the years up to 1912, when the RSDLP formally split into Bolshevik and Menshevik parties. The Bolsheviks’ political philosophy was based on the Leninist principles of vanguardism and democratic centralism.

After the February Revolution of 1917 which overthrew the tsar, Lenin returned to Russia and issued his April Theses, which called for “no support for the Provisional Government” and “all power to the soviets”. In the summer of 1917, especially after the July Days and Kornilov affair, large numbers of radicalized workers joined the Bolsheviks, which planned the October Revolution which overthrew the government. The party initially governed in coalition with the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries, but increasingly centralized power and suppressed opposition during the Russian Civil War, and after 1921 became the sole legal party in Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union.

Under Joseph Stalin’s leadership, the party became linked to his policies of “socialism in one country”, rapid industrialization, collectivized agriculture, and centralized state control. Vladimir Lenin, under the leadership of the Russian communist, seized power in the Russian Republic during the October Revolution. Overthrowing the pre-existing Provisional Government, the Bolsheviks established a new administration, the first Council of People’s Commissars (see article “Lenin’s First and Second Government”), with Lenin appointed as its governing chairman. Ruling by decree, Lenin’s Sovnarkom introduced widespread reforms, including confiscating land for redistribution among the permitting non-Russian nations to declare themselves independent, improving labor rights, and increasing access to education.

The Lenin party continued with the previously scheduled November 1917 election, but when it produced a Constituent Assembly dominated by the rival Socialist Revolutionary Party the Bolsheviks lambasted it as counter-revolutionary and shut it down. The Bolshevik government banned a number of centrist and right-wing parties and restricted the activities of rival socialist groups, but entered into a governmental coalition with the Left Socialist Revolutionary Party.

Lenin inherited a country in the midst of the First World War, with war-weary Russian troops battling the Central Powers of Germany and Austria-Hungary on the Eastern Front. Deeming the ongoing conflict a threat to his own government, Lenin sought to withdraw Russia from the war, using his Decree on Peace to establish an armistice. Negotiations took place resulting in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. This punitive treaty – highly unpopular within Russia – established a cessation of hostilities but granted considerable territorial concessions to Germany, who took control of large areas of the former Empire.

Legacy of Vladimir Lenin

Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (22 April 1870 – 21 January 1924), commonly known as Vladimir Lenin, was a prominent Russian revolutionary, politician, and political theorist. He held the position of the first and founding head of government of Soviet Russia from 1917 to 1924 and of the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1924. During his administration, Russia and subsequently the Soviet Union transformed into a one-party socialist state governed by the Communist Party. Lenin, an adherent of Marxism, introduced significant developments to the ideology, which became known as Leninism.

Raised in an upper-middle-class family in Simbirsk, Lenin adopted revolutionary socialist beliefs following the execution of his brother in 1887.

Upon being expelled from Kazan Imperial University for participation in protests against the Tsarist government, he pursued a law degree in the ensuing years.

In 1893, he relocated to Saint Petersburg and emerged as a senior Marxist activist. Subsequently, he faced arrest for sedition in 1897 and was exiled to Shushenskoye in Siberia for three years, where he entered into marriage with Nadezhda Krupskaya.

Following his exile, he moved to Western Europe and gained recognition as a prominent theorist within the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP).

In 1903, he assumed a pivotal role in the RSDLP ideological schism, leading the Bolshevik faction against Julius Martov’s Mensheviks.

Following the failed Revolution of 1905 in Russia, he advocated for the transformation of the First World War into a pan-European proletarian revolution, anticipating the overthrow of capitalism and the rise of socialism. Subsequent to the 1917 February Revolution, which resulted in the ousting of the Tsar and the establishment of a Provisional Government, Lenin returned to Russia and played a leading role in the subsequent October Revolution, through which the Bolsheviks overthrew the new regime.

Initially, Lenin’s Bolshevik government shared power with the Left Socialist Revolutionaries, elected soviets, and a multi-party Constituent Assembly, but by 1918 it had centralized power within the new Communist Party.

His administration initiated the redistribution of land among the peasantry and the nationalization of banks and large-scale industry.

It withdrew from the First World War by signing a treaty that conceded territory to the Central Powers and advocated for worldwide revolution through the Communist International.

Opponents were suppressed during the Red Terror, a forceful campaign administered by the state security services, leading to the deaths or internment of tens of thousands in concentration camps.

Lenin’s administration successfully quelled both right and left-wing anti-Bolshevik armies during the Russian Civil War from 1917 to 1922 and managed the Polish–Soviet War of 1919–1921.

In response to wartime devastation, famine, and popular uprisings, Lenin advocated for economic growth through the implementation of the New Economic Policy in 1921. Although several non-Russian nations had attained independence from the Russian Republic after 1917, five were forcibly reunited into the new Soviet Union in 1922, whereas others repelled Soviet invasions. With his health in decline, Lenin passed away in Gorki, and Joseph Stalin succeeded him as the pre-eminent figure in the Soviet government.

Regarded as one of the most significant and influential figures of the 20th century, Lenin became the subject of an enduring personality cult within the Soviet Union until its dissolution in 1991. He evolved into an ideological figurehead for Marxism–Leninism and exerted a pronounced influence over the international communist movement.

A controversial and deeply divisive historical figure, Lenin is celebrated by his supporters as a proponent of socialism, communism, anti-imperialism, and the working class, while his detractors accuse him of establishing a totalitarian dictatorship that oversaw mass killings and political repression of dissidents.

Historian Robert Conquest made the following statement. “The huge catastrophes of our era have been inflicted by human beings, driven by certain thoughts.” And he went on to say that some of those thoughts have become so deadly that they have killed millions.

Lets look at Vladimir Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik Revolution. The revolution that led of course, to the development of the USSR, the Soviet Union, and led eventually to tens and well over a hundred million deaths. All of it traceable to the Bolshevik Revolution.

Vladimire died 100 years. He died on January the 21st, 1924, and that brought an end to his life, but it did not bring an end to Soviet tyranny. It did not bring an end to the murderous, indeed genocidal reality of the Soviet Union. He may have died in 1924, but he was born on April the twenty-second of 1870.

The revolutionary fervor and even the revolutionary movement that led to the Bolshevik Revolution and to the formation of the Soviet Union in the 20th century wasn’t the first uprising in Russia. The 19th century in Russia was a century of ongoing attempts at revolution. Sergey Nechayev in his work entitled The Revolutionary Catechism of 1869, wrote, “The revolutionary is a dedicated man. He has no personal interest, no private affairs, no emotions, no attachments, no property and no name. Everything in him is subordinated towards a single thought, a single passion, the revolution.”

Now, among those revolutionaries, most people forget in terms of Russia, is a young man who was actually the older brother of Vladimir Lenin. He was involved with a group of other college students or university students in an attempted assassination of the Tsar, and he was executed for that. So as a teenager, Vladimir Lenin was forged in this revolutionary environment, which was fueling much of the unrest there in Russia. And of course, there’s an historical consequence there, and the context of the fact that Russia was an autocracy in terms of the Romanov dynasty, that frankly went beyond any of the major monarchial powers in Europe. That’s why, at least for one reason, along with other economic stresses, that there was this revolutionary fervor in Russia. Vladimir Lenin was a product of, and later a driver of that fervor.

Marx came along in the 19th century, and of course, Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Revolution. Lenin became an advocate for a Marxist revolution in Russia, and what would become, of course, by its product, the Soviet Union. But the uniqueness of Vladimir Lenin was the fact that he warped Marxist ideology in a way that made it even more dangerous and even more murderous. He developed the idea of what he called a vanguard party. That’s the idea that a party would seize control, and basically in the name of the people, would maintain that control, and it would largely maintain the power of its control by killing many of its own citizens. It was an intentional attempt to create a new communist reality with this vanguard party at the very head. And thus, there was no excuse for the power of this party because in Lenin’s theory, in his ideology, the party became everything.

The worth of human beings was denied if that worth was not to the party. Anyone opposed to the party became, well, as the Nazis would refer to them, life unworthy of life. Paul Johnson, one of the major historians of the 20th century, wrote this, “Once Lenin had abolished the idea of personal guilt, and had started to exterminate, a word he frequently employed, whole classes merely on account of occupation and parentage, there was no limit to which this deadly principle might be carried. There is no essential moral difference,” said Paul Johnson about Lenin, “Between destroying a class and destroying a race. Thus, the practice of genocide was born.”

And of course, the Soviet Union was also born, and it became one of the most malignant forces in the history of the entire human story. But it’s also clear that when Vladimir Lenin died, it was not a better that replaced him, but if anything, a worse, and that was Joseph Stalin. As Winston Churchill said, and he had long history observing the Soviet Union and both dictators, he said this, and I quote, “For Russians, their worst misfortune was Lenin’s birth. Their next worst, his death.”

And thus, it set the stage for the Soviet Union in terms of famine and war, and the internal genocide of its own people, the subjugation of many others. So a very long reminder, a very tragic reminder of the fact that ideas do have consequences. The consequences of the ideology of Vladimir Lenin turned out to be some of the most deadly and toxic of the entire human story.

ETERNAL GOD

The Eternal God operates beyond the confines of political correctness, cultural pressures, or any human constraints. He is holy and loving, but let us never forget that He is also a righteous judge, holding each individual, nation, and race accountable according to His divine will. He administers justice without partiality. God’s ways are not shaped by human falsehoods or the limitations of our understanding. His sovereignty surpasses our thoughts, feelings, and beliefs. Let us ponder deeply on the divine question posed by the LORD, “Will not the Judge of all the earth (universe) do right?” (Genesis 18:25) Certainly, emphatically, He will. It is essential to consider the context of this question and the subsequent events, such as the destruction of Sodom. This sentiment is echoed in Romans 2:5-11. It is important to understand that God does not conform to human trends or fads. His ways are higher than ours.

Negroid, Caucasoid, or mongoloid?

The concept of dividing people into three races – Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid (originally called “Ethiopian”) – was devised in the 1780s by scholars at the Göttingen School of History. This framework gained traction among Western scholars, particularly during the colonial era and the propagation of racist ideologies.

In the revised 1795 edition of his work “De generis humani varietate nativa” (On the Natural Variety of Mankind), Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a scholar at the contemporary Göttingen University, formulated a concept that classified humankind into five races. Despite the fact that Blumenbach’s concept later became associated with scientific racism, his arguments were fundamentally anti-racist. He emphasized the unity of humankind as a single species and noted that the transition from one race to another is so gradual that the distinctions he outlined are “very arbitrary.” Blumenbach included the inhabitants of North Africa in the “Caucasian race,” grouping other Africans into the “Ethiopian race.” In this context, he referred to the “Abyssinians” and “Moors” as peoples through which the “Ethiopian race” gradually “blended” with the “Caucasian race.”

The Caucasian race has historically been considered a biological classification encompassing ancient and modern populations from parts of Europe, Western Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa, depending on the specific historical race classification in use. Caucasoid traits were recognized as: thin nasal aperture (“nose narrow”), a small mouth, facial angle of 100–90°, and orthognathism, exemplified by what Blumenbach saw in most ancient Greek crania and statues.

The term “Mongoloid” referred to an obsolete racial grouping of various indigenous peoples from large parts of Asia, the Americas, and certain regions in Europe and Oceania. This term originated from a now-disproven theory of biological race. Previous terms such as “Mongolian race”, “yellow”, “Asiatic”, and “Oriental” have also been used as synonyms in the past. The last edition of the German encyclopedia Meyers Konversations-Lexikon (1971–79, 25 volumes) lists the following characteristics of the “Mongoloid” populations of Asia: “Flat face with a low nasal root, accentuated zygomatic arches, flat-lying eyelids (which are often slanting), thick, tight, dark hair, dark eyes, yellow-brownish skin, usually short, stocky build.”

The Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition (1910–1911), delineates the following “well-defined characteristics” of the “Negroid” populations in Africa, southern India, Malaysia, and Australasia: “A dark skin, ranging from dark brown, reddish-brown, or chocolate to nearly black; dark, tightly curled hair, with a flat traverse section, of either the woolly or frizzly type; a greater or lesser tendency towards prognathism; dark brown eyes with a yellowish cornea; a nose that is somewhat broad and flat; and large teeth”. The Encyclopædia Britannica observes a predilection for a “tall stature” and “dolichocephaly” (long-headedness), with the Negritos being an exception, as they are described as exhibiting “short stature” and “brachycephaly” (short-headedness).

However, in the modern era of genetics, it has become clear that the notion of distinct human races in a biological sense is entirely outdated. In 2019, the American Association of Biological Anthropologists unequivocally stated that “race doesn’t accurately represent human biological variation. It wasn’t accurate in the past, and it’s still not accurate when talking about people today.”

The biggest and most accepted races in modern anthropology are:

  • Europid (aka Caucasoid)
  • Americanoid
  • Mongoloid
  • Negroid
  • Khoisan
  • Australoid

In addition to those six major ones, there are also smaller races that are quite distinct nonetheless:

  • Ethiopid
  • Veddoid
  • Central African (aka Pygmoid)
  • Ainu
  • Southern Indian (aka Dravidian)

But those are not universally agreed upon: for example, some consider Ethiopians to be a subrace of Negroid with some admixture from Southern Europids.

The highest certainty is for Europids. They are further subdivided into Indo-Mediterraneans, Balkan-Caucasians etc. Sometimes, even subraces are further divided. For example, Indo-Mediterraneans are sometimes divided into Mediterraneans, Indo-Iranians etc — but it’s far from conclusive.

But if we take Americanoids, for example (native inhabitants of BOTH Americas), then clearly, there’s a lot of variation: probably enough for two or three major races. But unfortunately, we just don’t have enough data to speak conclusively about them: most native Central and South Americans got intermixed with colonizers before a proper anthropologist ever reached the place, and North America…well, you know what happened there.